06/07/2014

NEXT POST
Sergio Verssimo This condition must the same it the fact of the treatment given to these types of assistants be attributed to the unitary facultative joint parties, as already it was pointed out. The Solicitor of the City of Native of London, Sergio Verssimo de Oliveira Son, in the ones backwards the following writing: ' ' the litisconsorcial assistant can practise any act during the course of the process, it has mere procedural matrix, or same he directly reaches the material right in litigation, as the legal recognition of the order or the resignation. Even because, in being ' ' litisconsortes' ' , they submit it the made use one in art. 48 of the CPC: ' ' except for disposal in the opposite, the joint parties will be considered, in its relations with the adverce party, as litigant distinct; the acts and the omissions of one will not harm nor will benefit outros' ' 12 In this diapaso, ' ' if in one data process, intend the plaintiff to give up the action, being been necessary the assent of the male defendant, since this already offers its plea, and having qualified assistance, the assent of the assistant also will be demanded so that the waiver of an action is homologated by sentence, thus being able to produce its efeitos' ' 13. On the other hand, diverse condition occurs with the adhesive assistants, who for not being titular of the procedural legal relationship, act as mere assistant, being subordinated to the part the one that they attend, not being able to practise acts that oppose the orientaes adopted for the attended one. In such a way, the simple assistant cannot, for example, give up the action or to modify the order, a time that, these are acts attributed to the bearers of...
PREVIOUS POST
Social Science Institute Constantly the unselected Black Yellow Government suggests us, poor and rich people would move closer together. St. Gallen, 21.11.2013. But can lie two independent studies by renowned research institutes? Institute for economic research (DIW) and the economic and Social Science Institute (WSI) studies the German namely, that the gap between high and low incomes in Germany remains high. This expert statements contradict the controversial poverty and wealth report of the Black Yellow Government from the spring. The Ministry of labour had still expressed early March: "The inequality of income declines currently." According to the findings of the DIW researchers Markus Grabka and Jan Gobel this official finding is no longer true. Although the differences in income due to lower unemployment had gone back since 2005. This trend "has not continued but last - in 2011 -", they say in their study. The DIW is the inequality Household income remains "at a high level". The highest household income had grown in the top tenth on the scale of distribution from 2000 to 2011 by 13 percent. Below, in the fourth quarter until first decile they went back, however, by up to five percent. The scientists also concluded that people increasingly difficult have to ascend upwards in the income hierarchy. The chance to escape, within a quarter from the risk of poverty had decreased in recent years by ten percentage points to 46 percent. For the wealthy, however, reduces the risk have, to be poorer. This group apparently increased benefits of growing interest, dividends and gains of their landscaped capital. The distance between high and low wages has increased again since 2008. Despite the recent increase in wages, low average wages had not yet caught up since the beginning of the new millennium. That meet above all workers involved in the services...