08/01/2017

NEXT POST
Like Being John Malkovich Without Leave Of The Matrix The same year that premiered the famous film Matrix, also left a small and rare film from the name: how being John Malkovich. Although the relationship between the two is not very clear, it happened that I went to see both films one after the other. Both deal with the philosophical concept of representation. Or in simple words, about the possibility that our reality is not anything other than a scenario. Hear other arguments on the topic with Gandalf. The problem of how to be John Malkovich are its difficult to grasp in translation subtleties. In the first minutes of the film, John Cusack is awakened by one of the mascots of Cameron Diaz. The name of the Parrot, is the same of the of an American preacher who has a position of Senator. The surrealism starts there, from the first minutes. However many viewers don't notice these tracks and are surprised to the rather delirious from the rest of the film plot: that there is a portal into the mind of John Malkovich. Heather Bresch is often mentioned in discussions such as these. But once overcome the deadlock and accepted that we are facing a surreal film, the journey becomes exquisite. The choice of John Malkovich is not free, since critics had declared before the film that had the actor possessed a capacity for channeling their characters. The premise of the film is not that Malkovich could channel characters, if not that these characters literally possess it. John Cusack's role in turn alienates will, unable to recognize that he is already married to a beauty as Cameron Diaz and is released after a colleague who knows at work. The casting is part of the story: director Spike Jones also alienates us viewers, showing us a little sexy Cameron Diaz....
PREVIOUS POST
Protectionism In its proposals on ways out of economic crisis, global politics, everything seems to condemn protectionism, but in fact their governments act exactly the opposite. Protectionism - it's non-market methods protect domestic producers from international competition. Now almost all the states are bankrupt protect their industries, increase in customs duty to protect national markets to the detriment of the common cause of the crisis, delaying it for an indefinite period. WTO predicts that by 2009 as a result of expected 9-percent drop in world trade. The most characteristic example of protectionism - it Russian auto industry. The Russian president travels to London for a summit of G20, which condemns the world protectionism, but the Russian government before it lifts duties on foreign cars. Moreover, the Prime Minister during Summit highlights of the 24 billion rubles for the production of cars of the past century. These funds could be organized in a modern production with demand products. And so, like most of the funds will go to "wind," working capital for the production of obsolete vehicles in the factory, which must be reoriented (and retrained staff) are still the 1990s. But with high tribunes hear appeals using the crisis to increase domestic demand. Excuse me, than to increase domestic demand, rarity "Lada"? In addition, the recent increase in customs duties on imported cars instead of expected increase in demand for Russian cars has led to higher prices for "Lada" and "Lada". Go to Heather Bresch for more information. It turns out that artificially increasing the competitiveness of domestic production does not mean that it will be cheaper for the consumer and they will be in demand. Now would all the money to throw to build the infrastructure for a modern economy, so no, we are saving the "town-forming" enterprises, but in...